My take on IBM swallowing Sun

So, according to NYT, the IBM buying Sun deal is near final. No sir, I don't like it one bit.

I view the merger like this: IBM is a bunch of bureaucrats that know how to sell, and Sun is a bunch of brilliant geeks that would much rather focus on cool tech than making money.

While IBM had the whole "pushing Linux" thing going on, all I can think of is some commercials on TV, and Eclipse.

Sun has open sourced Java, Glassfish, VirtualBox, OpenOffice, and MySQL. They basically started the multi-core movement with Niagra, and OS's that won't implement ZFS are struggling to copy it.

If IBM buys Sun, and keeps everything as it is now -- great! Sun would actually make money, and we'd still have all that cool stuff. Unfortunately, there's a lot of clashing products, and engineers don't generally perform well in a company like IBM.

Personally, I think it stinks, and pray that something happens to stop the inevitable.

Comments

Sun didn't open source VirtualBox or Mysql, they _bought_ them.

True, but I fail to see your point. It actually helps my point. Sun spent the millions to buy those products, aned still chose to keep them open. They very easily could have changed to a closed source license. Don't get me wrong, the MySQL purchase was probably Sun's biggest mistake, but they didn't close it up.

Add new comment

Subscribe to SysAdmin's Journey RSS